undefined
WordPress runs 40.3% of all websites, a 58.8% share of the CMS market. It is not going anywhere, and it is free.
People still leave it, and almost always for the same three reasons: plugin maintenance, security patching, and the editor.
Prices were checked against each vendor’s own pricing page on 14 September 2026.
The best WordPress alternatives at a glance
One that is free and enterprise-grade, one developers genuinely enjoy, and one that removes the database entirely.
Craft CMS
The one developers like
Free solo / $279 a projectDrupal
Free, and built for scale
Free, open sourceAstro
No database, no patching
Free, open sourceCraft CMS
Content modelling done right
The alternative agencies actually migrate clients to. You define your content structure rather than bending posts and custom fields into shape, the editor experience is genuinely good, and templating is Twig or GraphQL. No plugin ecosystem of the WordPress size, which is the point: fewer moving parts to break. Hosting is yours to arrange unless you use Craft Cloud.
Free tier: Free tier: yes. Solo is free forever with one user account, full content modelling, multi-site and localisation. Team is $279 per project including a year of updates, then $99 a year, and free on Craft Cloud.
Drupal
Free, and the heavyweight
Where WordPress is a blog that grew into a CMS, Drupal was designed for structured content, complex permissions and multilingual sites from the start. Governments and universities run on it for that reason. The trade is unchanged after twenty years: steeper to learn, more expensive to hire for, and far better once the content model is genuinely complicated.
Free tier: Free tier: yes. Free and open source, with paid hosting and enterprise support available from vendors.
Joomla
The middle path
Sits between WordPress and Drupal: stronger built-in user management and multilingual support than WordPress without Drupal learning curve, and it still holds around a one per cent share of all websites. Its extension ecosystem is much smaller than it was. Worth considering mainly if you need multilingual and access control without commissioning a developer.
Free tier: Free tier: yes. Free and open source.
Statamic
Flat files, real CMS
Built on Laravel and able to store content as flat files rather than in a database, which means your content lives in version control alongside your templates. Deployments become git pushes and there is no database to back up or get compromised. Editors get a proper control panel. Fewer hosts support it out of the box than WordPress, so check yours.
Free tier: Free tier: yes, a free solo licence; paid per-site licences unlock multiple users and advanced features.
Payload CMS
Headless, code-first
A headless CMS you configure in TypeScript, so your content model is code, reviewable in a pull request. It gives you an admin interface and an API, and your front end is whatever you want. This is the right answer for a team already building in Next.js who want editors to have a decent experience without adopting a monolith.
Free tier: Free tier: yes. Open source and free to self-host; Payload Cloud is paid.
Astro
Delete the attack surface
Not a CMS, and that is the pitch. Astro builds your site into static HTML at deploy time, so there is no PHP, no database and nothing to patch at two in the morning. Content lives in Markdown, or comes from a headless CMS like Payload if editors need an interface. Pages load in well under a second and hosting is usually free. You give up one-click plugins entirely.
Free tier: Free tier: yes. Free and open source; hosting on Netlify, Cloudflare or GitHub Pages has a free tier.
| # | Tool | Best for | Free tier | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Craft CMS | Content modelling done right | Yes, Solo is free forever | Free for solo use, $279 per project for teams |
| 02 | Drupal | Free, and the heavyweight | Yes, fully free | Free, open source |
| 03 | Joomla | The middle path | Yes, fully free | Free, open source |
| 04 | Statamic | Flat files, real CMS | Yes, for solo use | Free solo tier, then per-site licence |
| 05 | Payload CMS | Headless, code-first | Yes, self-hosted free | Free, open source, paid cloud |
| 06 | Astro | Delete the attack surface | Yes, fully free | Free, open source |
Is anyone still using WordPress? Yes, most people
Worth answering with a number rather than an opinion. W3Techs measures WordPress at 40.3% of all websites, which is a 58.8% share of sites using a CMS at all. The next largest is Shopify at 5.4%, then Wix at 4.2% and Squarespace at 2.4%.
So the premise behind “is WordPress outdated” is wrong in the only way that can be measured. It is used more than every alternative combined, several times over.
What is fair is that WordPress asks more of you than it used to. A modern site is the core plus fifteen to thirty plugins, each an independent project with its own release schedule, its own security record and its own idea of how your data should be stored. Nothing breaks until a plugin update meets a PHP version bump on a Friday afternoon.
That maintenance burden, not the software, is what the tools below actually remove.
WordPress alternatives compared
Cheapest paid tier and what the free tier really allows, checked against each vendor’s own page on 14 September 2026.
Work out which WordPress problem you have
There are three, and they lead to different places.
“Plugins keep breaking and I keep patching.” You want fewer moving parts. Craft CMS or Statamic give you a real CMS with a small, curated add-on ecosystem. Astro removes the server-side stack entirely, so there is nothing to patch.
“The editor fights me.” This is a Gutenberg complaint, and it has a cheap answer before a migration: the Classic Editor plugin still works. If you have already tried that and still dislike it, Craft and Statamic have the best editing experiences here by a clear margin.
“My content is genuinely complex.” Multilingual, granular permissions, many related content types. This is the case where WordPress custom fields get twisted into a shape they were not designed for. Drupal was built for it, and Payload handles it well if your team writes code.
If your answer is “hosting is slow and expensive”, that is a hosting problem rather than a CMS problem, and moving to a better host is much cheaper than a migration.
What you give up, honestly
Three things, and the first is the one people underestimate.
The plugin ecosystem. Around sixty thousand plugins means that whatever niche thing you need, someone has built it. On Craft, Statamic or Payload, the equivalent is often a small custom build. That is a real cost, though it is also why those sites break less.
Hiring and handover. You can find a WordPress developer in any town at any budget. Craft and Drupal developers cost more; Payload developers are Next.js developers who will learn it. If a client will maintain the site after you, this matters more than any feature.
WooCommerce. If you sell products, WordPress plus WooCommerce is a genuinely strong, genuinely free option, and none of the alternatives here match it without going headless or moving to Shopify.
Migrating content out
The export is easier than people expect and the rest is harder.
WordPress exports posts, pages, categories, tags and comments as a WXR file, and every tool here can import it or convert it to Markdown. Media files come across as references, so you copy the uploads directory separately.
What does not transfer: page builder layouts, which are stored as shortcodes or block markup and become unreadable elsewhere; custom field configurations; form definitions; redirects; and anything a plugin stored in its own tables. If your site was built in Elementor or Divi, expect to rebuild every page’s layout by hand. That is usually the largest single line in a migration quote.
Before you switch, export your URL list and map every one to its new address. Search traffic is the asset you are actually risking.
How we test and price these tools
Every price here was read from the vendor’s own pricing page in a browser on 14 September 2026, not copied from another round-up. Market share figures come from W3Techs rather than from vendor marketing.
For content management systems we weigh three things above features: how much ongoing maintenance the stack demands, how easy it is to hire for, and what a content export actually produces. We also state whether a licence is per project or per site, since that decides the cost for an agency rather than an individual.
We read current Reddit threads for each tool, so the views here are from this year. No vendor pays for a place on this list.
WordPress alternatives FAQs
Taken from Google’s results and current threads on Reddit.
How we test01 Is WordPress outdated in 2026?
No, on any measure that can be checked. W3Techs puts it at 40.3% of all websites and 58.8% of the CMS market, several times the next largest. What has aged is the plugin-heavy way most WordPress sites are built, which is where the maintenance burden comes from.
02 What is the best open-source WordPress alternative?
Drupal if your content is genuinely complex, with structured content, granular permissions and multilingual built in rather than added by plugin. Joomla sits between the two on difficulty. Astro and Payload are open source too and take the static and headless routes respectively.
03 Which alternative is best for developers?
Craft CMS for a traditional CMS with proper content modelling and Twig templating, or Payload if you would rather define your content model in TypeScript and review it in a pull request. Statamic is the pick if you want content in flat files under version control.
04 Can I avoid maintaining plugins and security updates?
Largely, by removing the server-side stack. Astro builds your site to static HTML, so there is no PHP and no database to patch and nothing for an automated scanner to exploit. Statamic flat-file mode removes the database while keeping a CMS. Neither eliminates keeping dependencies current.
05 Is there a free alternative to WordPress?
Several. Drupal, Joomla, Astro and self-hosted Payload are free and open source. Craft Solo and Statamic both have free solo tiers. WordPress itself is free, so the real comparison is total cost including hosting, plugins and maintenance time.
06 What will I lose if I move off WordPress?
The plugin ecosystem, the ease of hiring, and WooCommerce. Page builder layouts from Elementor or Divi do not transfer at all and have to be rebuilt by hand, which is usually the largest cost in a migration. Posts, pages, categories and comments export cleanly.
07 I only dislike the block editor. Do I need to migrate?
Probably not. The Classic Editor plugin restores the previous editing experience and is still maintained. Try that before committing to a migration, because it costs nothing and solves the specific complaint that sends a lot of people looking.
Browse every alternatives guide, or start with the website builders category.
