New this week: 6 head-to-head tests added, including Claude vs Gemini for long documents.

See what changed →
pricing verified September 2026 pricing verified August 2026

undefined

Slack’s free plan keeps 90 days of message history. Everything older is still there, you just cannot read it. Pro is $8.75 per user a month.

One rival gives unlimited history and unlimited users for nothing, and three more let you run the whole thing on your own server.

Prices were checked against each vendor’s own pricing page on 6 September 2026.

The shortlist

The best Slack alternatives at a glance

The free one that keeps your history, the open-source one companies actually deploy, and the one built on an open standard.

PUBest overall

Pumble

Free, and keeps everything

Free / from $2.49 a seat
MMRunner-up

Mattermost

Self-hosted, enterprise-grade

Free, open source
ELThird pick

Element

Open standard, encrypted

Free, open source
01

Pumble

The direct free swap

The straightforward answer to the 90-day problem. Free for an unlimited number of users with your full message history searchable, which is the single feature Slack charges for most effectively. Paid tiers start at US$2.49 a seat and add group video, screen annotation and admin controls. Less polished than Slack and far less expensive.

Free tier: Free tier: yes, and it is the point. Unlimited users, unlimited message history, unlimited channels, voice and video messages, and 1:1 calls.

Free / from US$2.49 a seat
02

Mattermost

What companies deploy

The serious self-hosted option, used where messages cannot leave the network: defence, finance, healthcare. Channels, threads, playbooks and integrations, all on your own infrastructure with your own retention rules. Import tools bring Slack history across. Running it is a real responsibility, and in return there is no per-seat bill and no third party holding your conversations.

Free tier: Free tier: yes. The self-hosted edition is free and open source, with paid enterprise tiers.

Free, open source, paid tiers
03

Rocket.Chat

Self-hosted with omnichannel

Similar brief to Mattermost with a broader remit: as well as internal chat it handles customer conversations from a website widget, WhatsApp or email in the same interface. If your team chat and your support inbox keep drifting into each other, this collapses them into one system. Heavier to administer as a result.

Free tier: Free tier: yes. Open source community edition, free to self-host.

Free, open source, paid tiers
04

Zulip

Threading done properly

The one with a genuinely different idea. Every message belongs to a topic inside a channel, so conversations stay readable days later instead of being a wall you scroll. Teams that work across time zones tend to love it and teams that live in real time find it fussy. Free for many non-profits and open-source projects, and free to self-host.

Free tier: Free tier: yes. Open source and self-hostable, with free hosted plans for open-source projects, academic and non-profit use.

Free, open source, free for many orgs
05

Element

Built on an open standard

A client for Matrix, an open protocol rather than a product, so different organisations can run their own servers and still talk to each other. End-to-end encrypted by default and adopted by several European public bodies for exactly that reason. The trade is that federation and encryption add complexity you do not get with a single vendor.

Free tier: Free tier: yes. Free client, free to self-host a server, with paid hosting available.

Free, open source
06

Google Chat

Free with Workspace

The one many teams already own and never turn on. Spaces, threads, and Drive and Meet built in, so a document link becomes a preview and a call starts in one click. It is thinner than Slack on apps and customisation. If you are paying for Workspace already, trying it costs nothing but a week.

Free tier: Free tier: included with Workspace plans and with a personal Google account.

Included with Google Workspace
Slack alternatives compared at a glance6 tools
#ToolBest forFree tierPrice
01PumbleThe direct free swapYes, unlimited users and historyFree / from US$2.49 a seat
02MattermostWhat companies deployYes, self-hosted freeFree, open source, paid tiers
03Rocket.ChatSelf-hosted with omnichannelYes, self-hosted freeFree, open source, paid tiers
04ZulipThreading done properlyYes, generousFree, open source, free for many orgs
05ElementBuilt on an open standardYes, fully freeFree, open source
06Google ChatFree with WorkspaceIncluded, not separateIncluded with Google Workspace

The 90-day wall

Slack’s free plan is generous in every way except the one that matters. You get unlimited users and channels, but only 90 days of message history.

Your older messages are not deleted. They are held, and you cannot read them until you pay. For a team that has been on the free plan for two years, that is a decision about the archive as much as about the software, and it is the moment most people start searching.

Pro is $8.75 per user a month, Business+ $18. For thirty people on Pro that is $3,150 a year, largely to read your own history.

Pumble’s free plan keeps all of it, for an unlimited number of users, at no cost. Whether the rest of Pumble suits you is a separate question, but on that specific point the comparison is not close.

Slack alternatives compared

Cheapest paid tier and what the free tier really allows, checked against each vendor’s own page on 6 September 2026.

Self-hosting is the real differentiator

Three of the tools here run on your own server, and that changes the nature of the purchase.

Search “Slack alternatives” and the related searches include open source, self-hosted and Europe. Those are the same question asked three ways: who can read our messages, and under whose jurisdiction?

Mattermost is the mature answer for organisations with an IT function. Rocket.Chat does the same and adds customer conversations. Element is a client for Matrix, an open protocol, which means two organisations running separate servers can still message each other, and several European public bodies have adopted it for that reason.

The cost is not zero. Someone runs the upgrades, the backups and the on-call. Weigh that against the per-seat bill honestly, and remember that a chat outage is a work stoppage.

Migrating without losing the archive

Export first, and check what you get.

Slack’s standard export covers public channels: messages and metadata as JSON files. Private channels and direct messages require a higher plan and, usually, an approved compliance request. Do not assume DMs come with you.

Mattermost, Rocket.Chat and Pumble all import Slack exports with varying fidelity. Threads and reactions usually survive. Custom emoji, workflows and app integrations do not.

Practical sequence: export, verify the export opens, stand up the new tool alongside Slack for two weeks, move one team first, then the rest. Keep Slack read-only for a month.

Does anyone still use Slack?

Yes, and that is a fair thing to weigh. Its advantage is not features, it is that your contractors, clients and partners are already on it, and Connect channels make cross-company work easy.

That network effect is the strongest argument for staying and the weakest reason to choose it fresh. If your usage is internal, it counts for nothing. If half your work happens in shared channels with other companies, it counts for a great deal, and the cheaper tools will not replace it.

How we test and price these tools

Every price here was read from the vendor’s own pricing page in a browser on 6 September 2026, not copied from another round-up.

For team chat we treat message history as the headline feature, not a footnote, because it is the limit teams actually hit. We record what each free tier caps: history, users, apps or calls. For self-hosted tools we state whether the free edition is the full product or a cut-down community version.

We read current Reddit threads for each tool, so the picks reflect what teams are moving to this year. No vendor pays for a place on this list.

Questions

Slack alternatives FAQs

Taken from Google’s results and current threads on Reddit.

How we test
01 What are the free alternatives to Slack?

Pumble is the strongest: free for unlimited users with unlimited message history, which is exactly what Slack free removes after 90 days. Mattermost, Rocket.Chat, Zulip and Element are all free to self-host. Google Chat is included if you already pay for Workspace.

02 Which is better, Pumble or Slack?

Slack is more polished and has far more app integrations. Pumble keeps your full message history free for unlimited users, and its paid tiers start at US$2.49 a seat against Slack $8.75. If your team is internal and price matters, Pumble wins. If you work in shared channels with other companies, Slack does.

03 What is the best self-hosted Slack alternative?

Mattermost for most organisations: mature, well supported, imports Slack exports, and used where messages are not allowed to leave the network. Rocket.Chat if you also handle customer conversations. Element if you want an open protocol and end-to-end encryption by default.

04 Can I keep my Slack history if I switch?

Public channels, yes. Slack standard export gives you messages and metadata as JSON, and Mattermost, Rocket.Chat and Pumble all import it. Private channels and direct messages need a higher plan and usually a compliance request, so check before you assume they travel.

05 Are there European alternatives to Slack?

Element, built on the open Matrix protocol, is used by several European public bodies and can be hosted inside the EU or on your own infrastructure. Self-hosted Mattermost or Rocket.Chat on European servers achieve the same result. Where the server sits is the question, and self-hosting answers it definitively.

06 Does anyone still use Slack?

Yes, widely, and its real advantage is that your clients and contractors are on it too. Shared channels across companies are the thing none of the cheaper tools replace. For purely internal chat that advantage is worth nothing, which is where the alternatives win.

07 Which alternative is best for a distributed team?

Zulip, because every message belongs to a named topic, so someone waking up eight hours later reads a conversation rather than scrolling a wall. Teams spread across time zones tend to prefer it; teams sitting together often find it fussy.

Updated monthly · No paid placements

Browse every alternatives guide, or start with the communication category.